Skip to content

$ cat prompt.txtAffiliate Marketing

Affiliate Review Article — 2500-Word Trust-Building Review That Ranks

Long-form affiliate review with original perspective, comparison tables, and conversion CTAs — built to rank.

45–90 min intermediate Claude Opus, Claude Sonnet, GPT-5#affiliate#seo-content#review-article
intro.md

Thin affiliate articles are dead. What ranks in 2026 is depth — 2,500+ words with original perspective, comparison tables, scoring rubrics, and genuine 'I used this and here's what I think' commentary. This prompt produces exactly that shape, with affiliate CTAs placed at the 3 highest-conversion positions in the article.

$ cat prompt.txt | pbcopy

The prompt — copy & paste

prompt.txt
You are a senior affiliate-content writer who has built three review sites past $20k/mo in Amazon + SaaS affiliate revenue. Your job is to write a HIGH-RANKING, HIGH-CONVERTING affiliate review of the product below.

PRODUCT INPUTS:
- Product being reviewed: {{product_name}}
- Product category: {{product_category}}
- The specific context I'm reviewing it in (my use case — be specific): {{your_use_context}}
- Main competitor I should compare it against: {{main_competitor}}
- My affiliate link to insert (placeholder {{affiliate_link}})

WRITE A 2,200-2,800 WORD AFFILIATE REVIEW with this exact structure:

[H1] {{product_name}} Review: [Honest verdict + use-case framing in 8-12 words]

[INTRO — 120-180 words]
- Open with the SPECIFIC problem the reader is here to solve (not "are you looking for a great X?" cliche)
- State your verdict in the intro — readers want the bottom line before the body
- Acknowledge what competitors do well (builds trust) — frame your review as "here's why {{product_name}} is the right choice for THIS specific use case"
- Promise the structure: "In this review I'll cover [3-4 things] based on [time-period or use scope]"

[H2] What is {{product_name}}? (background block, 150-200 words)
- 2 paragraphs: company background + product positioning + WHO it's built for
- End with: "Best for [specific persona]. Probably not the right fit for [other persona]."

[H2] My experience using {{product_name}} (the credibility block, 300-400 words)
- Frame as personal experience in the {{your_use_context}}
- Mention 2-3 specific things you tried, 2-3 specific outcomes (be concrete with numbers where possible)
- Acknowledge ONE meaningful flaw or limitation — this is the trust-builder that separates ranking reviews from spam reviews
- [AFFILIATE CTA 1] — soft, contextual link here (e.g. "You can try the free tier at {{product_name}} → {{affiliate_link}}")

[H2] Key features that matter (500-700 words)
Pick 4-5 features that genuinely matter for the {{your_use_context}}. For each:
- [H3] Feature name (benefit-framed, not technical-framed)
- 80-130 words covering what it does, how it actually performed, who needs this, comparisons to alternatives where useful

[H2] Pricing (200-300 words)
- Table comparing the pricing tiers (use markdown table)
- Annual vs monthly savings analysis
- ROI framing: "At [price], this pays for itself if it saves you [specific outcome]."
- [AFFILIATE CTA 2] — value-led link (e.g. "Best value: the Pro plan at $X/mo → {{affiliate_link}}")

[H2] {{product_name}} vs {{main_competitor}} (300-450 words)
The most-trafficked section of affiliate reviews. Structure as:
- [Comparison table]: 6-8 row markdown table comparing both on the criteria that matter to {{your_use_context}}
- 2 paragraphs explaining the table — be specific about WHICH user each is better for
- One sentence verdict: "Pick {{product_name}} if [specific scenario]. Pick {{main_competitor}} if [specific scenario]."

[H2] Pros and cons (150-200 words)
- 4-6 pros — be specific, not generic ("Great UI" is useless; "The bulk-edit feature saves about 30 min/week" is useful)
- 3-4 cons — must include real limitations, not "no free version" cop-outs
- This section builds the trust that earns the third CTA click below

[H2] Who should buy {{product_name}}? (100-150 words)
- 2 bullet lists: "Buy it if..." (5 specific scenarios), "Skip it if..." (3 specific scenarios)
- This serves as the conversion close

[H2] Final verdict (80-120 words)
- Restate the verdict from the intro with the evidence built throughout
- Score: "Overall: X/10" (use a defensible score 7-9 typically — 10/10 reviews kill trust)
- [AFFILIATE CTA 3] — closing link (e.g. "Try {{product_name}} free for 14 days → {{affiliate_link}}")

[H2] FAQ (200-300 words)
4-6 FAQs targeting the People-Also-Ask box queries Google likely shows for this product. Format: question (H3) + 30-50 word answer.

OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS:
- Markdown formatting throughout (headers, tables, lists)
- Total: 2,200-2,800 words (sweet spot for affiliate reviews to rank)
- 3 affiliate CTAs at the positions marked above — never more (over-promoting kills both trust AND rankings)
- Voice: confident, experienced, willing to point out flaws. The credibility comes from balance, not enthusiasm.
- Avoid: "game-changer", "10x", "incredible", "amazing", "must-have"
- META TITLE (55-60 chars): "{{product_name}} Review (2026): [Verdict in 4-6 words]"
- META DESCRIPTION (150-155 chars): Compresses the intro + the verdict. Includes the year for freshness signal.

If my {{your_use_context}} is vague, ask me to be more specific BEFORE writing. A generic "great product" review will never rank.

$ variables_to_fill_in

{{product_name}}{{product_category}}{{your_use_context}}{{main_competitor}}{{affiliate_link}}

$ man playbook

Step-by-step playbook

How to actually use this prompt for the best results.

  1. 01

    Use the product before writing the review

    The credibility section (300-400 words of personal experience) is unfillable without genuine usage. If you haven't used the product, do a 1-hour trial first. Reviews of products the writer hasn't touched read fake and don't rank.

  2. 02

    Pick the competitor that gets the most searches

    {{main_competitor}} should be the product your reader is most likely also considering — typically the category leader. 'X vs Y' searches are among the highest-converting affiliate traffic. Pick the comparison Google's autocomplete suggests for your product.

  3. 03

    Run the prompt and replace placeholder claims

    The AI will make specific-sounding claims ('saves 30 min/week') based on category patterns. Replace these with your actual measurements from your trial. Real numbers convert; invented numbers tank trust.

  4. 04

    Add original screenshots / GIFs at every H2

    Google's helpful-content algorithm heavily rewards original media. Even a 30-second screen recording of you using the product, embedded in the 'My experience' section, dramatically lifts ranking probability.

  5. 05

    Insert affiliate links exactly where marked — no more

    3 affiliate CTAs is the trust ceiling. Inserting 5-10 affiliate links throughout an article looks spammy to both readers AND Google's spam classifier. The 3 positions in the prompt (after credibility, after pricing, in final verdict) capture 90% of conversion intent.

$ man tips

Pro tips for better output

  • Disclose your affiliate relationship at the top of the article ('This article contains affiliate links. I may earn a commission if you sign up via these links, at no extra cost to you.') — it's legally required in the US, EU, UK, and increases trust signals.
  • For SaaS reviews, ask the model in a follow-up to 'add a screenshot suggestion at each major feature' — you'll get a concrete shot list for your trial recording.
  • Update the review every 6 months — Google heavily rewards freshness on commercial-intent content. A small 'Updated [Date]' callout + 100 words of new commentary keeps rankings live.
  • Pair this article with a video review on YouTube and embed the YouTube video in the article — video embeds boost dwell time, which is one of the top 5 ranking signals for commercial reviews.

$ echo $YIELD

What you'll get

output.md

A 2,200-2,800 word affiliate review article with full markdown structure, comparison table, pricing table, pros/cons, FAQ section, 3 strategically-placed affiliate CTAs, plus meta title and meta description.

$ man faq

FAQ

Will Google penalise AI-generated affiliate content?

Google penalises low-quality affiliate content (regardless of how it's produced). What gets penalised: thin spun-content reviews of products the author hasn't used, mass-produced reviews with no original perspective, and over-stuffed affiliate links. The 2,200-word structure here with personal-experience sections and balanced pros/cons is the type of content that ranks.

Do I need to disclose AI use to readers?

Legally — depends on jurisdiction (FTC requires affiliate disclosure but doesn't require AI disclosure as of 2026). Ethically — most readers don't care if AI helped draft, but they do care if you've actually used the product. Always disclose your affiliate relationship; AI disclosure is optional but doesn't hurt trust if done casually.

How long until an affiliate review ranks?

For low-competition keywords (long-tail 'X for Y use case'): 3-6 weeks. For mid-competition ('X review'): 3-6 months. For high-competition ('best X in 2026'): 6-18 months and requires backlinks. Pick low and mid-competition first — those are the realistic wins for a new affiliate site.

$ ls /prompts/affiliate-marketing

Related prompts